« April 2005 | Main | June 2005 »

May 28, 2005

Math makes me queasy

I have always despised math, despite being quite good at it, as far as my training goes. In every standardized text I can recall taking (including the PRAXIS 1 text that I took at the very end of the PhD program), I scored higher on the quantitative section than on the verbal or even writing sections.

And yet my entrance essay for American University--a response to the question, "If you could change any fact or facet of human history, what would you change and why?"--I argued (satifically, mostly) for the abolition of math.

Why do I hate math so, then?

Because you use it to talk about money. As soon as I find it, I'd like to link to a great blog post and discussion on "academic class" and how we compare to our parents' generation. But class and income and money in general are all things that I am deeply uncomfortable discussing(which is why when I discuss it, I often fear I am either inappropriately forthcoming, or unnecessarily elusive).

But here's the thing about talking about money: Either I'm embarrassed about not having as much as those I'm talking to, or I'm embarrassed about having more. Which has been tricky, since in a very short time, Ann and I went from being two in-debt grad-students to two professionals who, through luck and tragedy, have more money than we need (though not more than we can use wisely and, I hope, with conscience).

So after yesterday's settlement for the townhome we just sold (we're renting back until July), we went to the bank to get the additional money we need for the settlement on our new home wired to the settlement attorney. Lots of numbers, floating around. Ones that make me feel embarrassed and ashamed about plentitude, even as I will enjoy that plentitude.

May 26, 2005

Beginnings

As I sit here working on an article about narrative beginnings and the theatre, I am brought to mind about the way that we think about beginnings in our own lives. the the Poetics, Aristotle calls a beginning something like "an event that nothing necessarily precedes, but after which other events must follow," and narratologist A.D. Nuttall complicates this by suggesting that nothing can really be said to have nothing that precedes it, except maybe the beginning of the universe. He allows that births and first lines of books count as beginnings for most practical purposes. Edward Said prefers the more passive term "origin" to "beginning," marked as the latter is by a more organic building toward events and identities, rather than a cataclysmic moment of generation.

What this brief primer on narrative beginnings leads me to is to wonder about when my "new life" in Appalacchia begins. Can I say that it begins when I start teaching in August? when we move there in July? when we settle on our new home on Tuesday? Or did it begin when I accepted the job? or when I first visited the campus, or when I first met the faculty at MLA or when I applied for the job last fall, or perhaps when I started graduate school, or kindergarten, for that matter?

Obviously, "origins" are complicated, because they seek to create linear causality out of the much stickier miasma of daily life. But this beginning feels like it needs to be marked because of the changes I hope to import into it. Habits of mind, mostly, but also habits of daily life, or interaction, of being in the world. When do I start them?

Of course the answer is "now." I start trying to be mindful of the small things around me, the cat at my ankles, the sounds from the road outside, the taste of dark chocolate that lingers from my illicit breakfast, the antique stopwatch ticking away to my right (Ann's mom's stuff was appraised yesterday, and I am typing at the dining room table amidst books, candles, and jewelry).

My work, too, needs a new start in certain ways, or at least a re-boot. The dissertation conversion has stalled over the last two years as many of my energies were devoted to job seeking, twin-raising, and the wrong-footedness of not knowing whether Would need to "become" a rhet/comp scholar. and yet as I return to the discourses of literature and performance, it is not a clean return either: my thinking is inflected by the specifications of my new job, which enforce a greater attention to British performance than American, by my time spent in rhet/comp (I am seriously mulling over a writing up a conference abstract for a history of rhetoric conference in Boston this fall), and by the passing time: last night at the wordherders meet-up, I spoke with Claire Macdonald about how the critical moment of theory on Gender and performance seems to have passed, and how the next draft of the dissertation needs to historicize the 80s and 90s in a way that the previous draft didn't because it was in the present.

And so I return, when do I begin? Do I begin packing boxes, sorting clothes, shopping for funiture, throwing out magazines? Do I begin writing every day, blogging confessionally, sticking to the academic prose, reading for work?

Or this simply a matter of stopping, of not doing things I used to do: living in Maryland, surfing the web too much, pushing off academic work until "sometime later." The endings and the beginnings are too closely tied, and yet never sufficiently coincidental to make anything solid, clear, or obvious.

May 9, 2005

A love letter to DC

This summer, I will have lived inside the Beltway for 13 years (well, near the beltway--the Greenbelt apartment was about .1 mile outside the damn thing).

When I arrived here, I
* was a young Republican
* was 127 pounds
* was less mature than most my age
* hoped to be a broadcast journalist
* had no idea how to live in the city
* thought Italian was adventurous ethnic food
* had never been to a rock concert that wasn't Christian contemporary
* occasionally wore sweatpants under my jeans to keep my legs from looking too skinny
* Thought Javan was a great poet, and that Monet was really amazing
* was highly skeptical of evolution
* was planning on voting for papa Bush
* was afraid of homeless people
* thought gay and lesbian men and women were sinners
* believed that premarital sex was a sin, and believed myself a sinner for wanting it
* hoped I'd be married by 22.

I was 18, and soon I will be 31. None of these things (I hope) is still true. And sure, many of those changes would've come with time (especially the not being 127 pounds), but they've all happened in this amazing, conflicted, hopeful city.

I suspect that this town will be "home" for me for a long long time.

May 2, 2005

Rhet/comp/cultural studies and Anti-disciplinarity

Though it's been up for a bit, I don't believe I ever posted a link to the article in Enculturation that gave rise to the new book collection that I'm collaborating on.

The article, co-authored with Rachel Riedner, is entitled "Cultural Studies, Rhetoric Studies, and Composition: Towards an Anti-Disciplinary Nexus," and argues for "elevating cultural studies scholarship from the shadows of the rhet/comp dyad, to imagine the ways that as a triad of modes of inquiry (not discrete disciplines), rhetoric, composition, and cultural studies might invigorate one another in service of an anti-disciplinary politics in the [writing] classroom and in our scholarship."